first_img10 Filipino kids back from Barca camp stint After winning title, time for LA Tenorio to give back to Batangas folk Lights inside SMX hall flicker as Duterte rants vs Ayala, Pangilinan anew “They get so many bodies behind the ball that they’re difficult to break down and maybe if we didn’t score, we would’ve gone into the next game thinking it’s a bigger challenge but knowing that we can score against them gives us confidence going into the second leg.”Eriksson said they will play without fear in Hanoi.“The result was a pity because we scored a goal (by Reichelt) and we had some (good) occasions (to score more),” said the Swede. “But (there are) still 90 minutes to go. We’ll go there (in Vietnam) to try (to win).”Sports Related Videospowered by AdSparcRead Next ‘Mia’: Rom-com with a cause a career-boosting showcase for Coleen Garcia LATEST STORIES Don’t miss out on the latest news and information. Japeth Aguilar embraces role, gets rewarded with Finals MVP plum Lights inside SMX hall flicker as Duterte rants vs Ayala, Pangilinan anew But as the Azkals head to Hanoi for the second leg this Thursday, they are taking encouragement from the fact that they were the first team in the tournament that breached the Vietnam goal with Patrick Reichelt’s unstoppable close-range strike tying the match at halftime.Still, coach Sven Goran Eriksson’s men acknowledge the enormity of the task at hand, especially with their opponents scoring two away goals, although the players are taking inspiration from the feat of the 2010 team that stunned Vietnam, 2-0, at My Dinh Stadium.FEATURED STORIESSPORTSGinebra beats Meralco again to capture PBA Governors’ Cup titleSPORTSJapeth Aguilar wins 1st PBA Finals MVP award for GinebraSPORTSGolden State Warriors sign Lee to multiyear contract, bring back Chriss“Time to make a new miracle in Hanoi,” declared goalkeeper Michael Falkesgaard, who was caught stranded when Nguyen Anh Duc opened the scoring in the 12th minute for the Vietnamese side.Falkesgaard could do little to stop Phan Van Duc’s strike three minutes into the second half as the nippy Vietnam striker beat the offside trap, before beating the Azkals goalkeeper in a one on one opportunity. BACOLOD CITY—There’s no shortage in belief and confidence from the Philippines even after a 1-2 setback to Vietnam in the first leg of their AFF (Asean Football Federation) Suzuki Cup semifinal tie.The Azkals were left undone by a combination of poor defending and Vietnam’s incisiveness as they conceded a goal in each half in Sunday’s match played before a crowd of 5,500 at Panaad Stadium here.ADVERTISEMENT No.13 lucky for Orlando Bloom The Azkals now have to pull off at least a 2-0 win in the Vietnamese capital to reach the finals for the first time.Captain Phil Younghusband believes they are capable of hammering out the feat.“We’ve seen bigger miracles in football,” said Younghusband. “It means that we now need to go for things in the second game and I think that will suit us better knowing that we have to go and score rather than sitting back.”“They’re a young team and I think we showed today that we can get at them and create chances and if we can stop them from scoring, we’ve got a chance so for me I think it’s all to play for—it’s a one-goal difference and I think we still have a chance.”The Azkals’ all-time leading scorer believes the way Vietnam was set up defensively made it difficult for them to break down the visiting side.But their lone goal, which came off a quick combination from Stephan Schrock, Jovin Bedic and a quality cross from Younghusband on the left, teed up Reichelt’s impressive finish.ADVERTISEMENT Carpio hits red carpet treatment for China Coast Guard PLAY LIST 02:14Carpio hits red carpet treatment for China Coast Guard02:56NCRPO pledges to donate P3.5 million to victims of Taal eruption00:56Heavy rain brings some relief in Australia02:37Calm moments allow Taal folks some respite03:23Negosyo sa Tagaytay City, bagsak sa pag-aalboroto ng Bulkang Taal01:13Christian Standhardinger wins PBA Best Player award MOST READ Gretchen Barretto’s daughter Dominique graduates magna cum laude from California college Ginebra beats Meralco again to capture PBA Governors’ Cup title Nadine Lustre’s phone stolen in Brazil View commentslast_img read more

first_imgThe coalition Government remains firm on its stance that a total of 34 votes are needed for a no-confidence motion to be passed in the National Assembly. This was reiterated on Sunday by Vice President and Public Security Minister Khemraj Ramjattan during an interview on the National Communications Network (NCN) programme titled “Context”.Public Security Minister Khemraj RamjattanThis comes on the heels of Government Member of Parliament (MP) Charrandas Persaud voting (before being expelled) in favour of the motion brought against the Administration by the parliamentary Opposition.However, Minister Ramjattan highlighted that after careful consideration and revision of Article 106 of the Constitution, the Government has decided to challenge the motion. He noted that there were precedents as it relates to the passage of a no-confidence motion that the Government intended to build its argument on, come January 3, 2019.“In view of what happened on the 21st when the Speaker of the House indicated that he is going to adjourn Parliament to deal with the consequences, we have decided that we are going to argue the case that it has not been a threshold figure that was arrived at,” Minister Ramjattan stated.He further explained that “once the threshold figure is arrived at and we are now arguing it is 34 as against 33, then Article 106 is triggered, meaning that the elections must be held within a 90-day period; however, we are saying that will have to now be determined by the Speaker because the internal arrangement of the House is headed by the Speaker and if the Speaker determines there is clearly a mistake in relation to computation of what the threshold level is and that could be corrected… we feel that is the way to go.”The Minister said that he recognised that immediately after the motion was passed, there were statements by President David Granger and Prime Minister Moses Nagamootoo accepting the outcome of the motion. However, he pointed out that based on the context of what took place, the statements were necessary based on what the Government had felt at that time.Nevertheless, he said that upon realising that a mistake was made and that the Constitution must not be subverted by a miscalculation, it has to be remedied.The question of why only now 34 votes are needed to pass a motion when there is an internal parliamentary precedent of 33 votes being a majority since 2011 was posed to the Minister, who explained that the same was not required for a motion of this nature.“There is a distinction, because there is an article in our Constitution that says that bills and motions can be passed save and except otherwise provided, by a simple majority of those present and voting… a confidence or no-confidence motion is a different motion above all else as the Constitution made mention,” Minister Ramjattan explained.The Minister was making a distinction between Article 168 (1) and Article 106 (6) of the Constitution which states, “Save as otherwise provided by this Constitution, all questions proposed for decision in the National Assembly shall be determined by a majority of votes of the members present and voting” and “the Cabinet including the President shall resign if the government is defeated by the vote of a majority of all elected members of the National Assembly on a vote of confidence” respectively.Minister Ramjattan further clarified that half of 65 is 32.5 which is then rounded to 33, making 33 and one half which then makes 34 the majority, according to the Department of Public Information (DPI).The Minister said this is why Article 106 (6) is listed in the Constitution. “It is important that people just do not follow through as what is regarded as simplicity. The law is the law and that is why the Constitution made an exception to Article 168 by having Article 168 drafted the way it is and also now, save and except this Article 106 (6).”last_img read more